Greetings, you zarkin’ froods!
Last week I said that I would return this week with my take on the film Watchmen.
I also like having bamboo shoved under my fingernails, being given hundreds of paper cuts then having lemon juice squeezed on them, and setting myself on fire while watching re-runs of “Joanie Loves Chachi”.
Seriously – reviewing a film like Watchmen is no easy task. I find myself slightly overwhelmed even as I type these words. And these words. Not so much with these words. Nope, back to being overwhelmed as I type this out.
I think part of the reason why is because Zack Snyder did such a great job with this movie. All of the complexity and most of the subtle nuances of the graphic novel (mini-series to those who read it when it was first published back in 1986) were faithfully and successfully transferred over from the comic medium to the celluloid (digital) medium.
And this was no easy feat. From the beginning this was a project most deemed as “unfilmable”. Even original comic scribe Alan Moore dismissed it as a ridiculous venture. Of course, Moore says that about all of his comic properties, which is why many believe him to be a cantankerous recluse who also happens to be a great writer. Despite those allegations, Moore’s objections turned out to be correct over the past several years, as almost all of his works that were adapted into movies turned out to be awful.
This is one of many ways that Watchmen stands out, as Zack Snyder managed to do what most considered impossible.

And let’s be honest, he had his work cut out for him. “Watchmen” the comic mini (graphic novel for those who read it after 1987) is filled with allegory and symbolism. It’s a look at superheroes in a realistic world, and then the deconstruction of said superheroes. It’s an analysis of the world as it stood in 1985, its policies and practices, its ideas and attitudes, its politics and principles. There are multiple themes scattered throughout the narrative. Some of them slap you in the face while others require a little more effort to see, even requiring multiple readings.
Snyder managed to keep all of these things completely intact in his adaptation, despite having to make some plot changes and scene cuts that would be necessary in order to squeeze a twelve part comic series (one part graphic novel for those who like the story all at once) into a film that comes in a little under three hours.
The final product is nothing short of incredible. Visually, the movie delivers a cascade of intense and colorful imagery, invoking the same sense of style and scenery illustrated in the source material. Like he did with 300, Snyder filmed almost every scene as a moving replica of the original printed pages. It literally looks like the comic has leapt off the page and has gone into full motion for the audiences viewing pleasure.
The casting for this movie was spot-on. Every actor and actress hits their mark perfectly as their respective characters, especially Jackie Earle Haley (Rorschach) and Billy Crudup (Doctor Manhattan). Even Malin Ackerman (Silk Spectre II), whom many have criticized for having the weakest performance, did extremely well with her performance. Each of the main characters became living, breathing versions of their comic book counterparts, retaining all of the complexity and depth that Moore wrote for them twenty-three years ago.
The special effects never fell short, either. This movie proved that you can still do amazing and wonderful things with CGI without it looking shoddy. Doctor Manhattan’s motion capture effects, as well as elements like the Martian base and even Rorshach’s mask were seamlessly integrated into the film.

Now, I’ve given a decent-sized paragraph to a few of the important elements that make up the film. But, what makes this review such a daunting task isn’t each piece of the whole, it’s the fact that there are so many pieces that make up the whole.
Watchmen is complex – in character, in story, and in scope. It’s a social commentary on people, and how we are reflected in our love of the superhero mythos. There are no less than five different radically opposing world views in both the comic and the film. Each one is given its moment to make its point, but at no time do any of them try to establish itself as the right view. In that regard, Snyder – as well as Moore before him – have taken this dark narrative and turned it into a mirror for the audience to look into. Each one of us takes away from it what we want to see. Each of us sees only what we allow ourselves to notice. Those who tend to favor the black and white, lack of moral greys view that Rorschach has may see this film as a middle finger to that institution. Someone else who sees the world through moral ambiguity may find the ending slightly unsatisfying, as the story almost dares to suggest that right and wrong are set in stone no matter what decisions we make.
And there lies the crux of what makes a review of Watchmen, be it comic or movie, so difficult. There’s no real way for one person to do a complete review. Each reviewer will take what he or she wants away from what they see or read, whether because they overlook everything else by accident or because they choose to ignore everything but what satisfies them. To get the full experience, to truly get a complete and satisfying review, one needs to read several of them. Every review contains a piece of the whole.
But to understand the film, to really get it beyond what it seems to convey on the surface, you need to go in completely open-minded, allowing yourself to be an empty canvas that serves as a receptacle to everything visual and audible, implied and direct, subtle and over-the-top. You have to let it paint its tapestry on you, so that when you leave the theater you have the complete picture.
And the best part is, no matter how you feel when you leave the theater, no matter whether you liked it or hated it, Zach Snyder has created a film on the threshold of cinematic achievement. Because there is one pleasant side-effect I’ve noticed since the movie was released over a week ago – Watchmen has people analyzing and discussing the film in great detail. People aren’t just sticking with simple answers as to why they did or did not like Watchmen. There are some deep discussions being had. And it’s doubly impressive considering this is still considered a superhero movie. There is some deep thought going on that not even Spider-Man or the The Dark Knight could drum up.
So even if the film doesn’t earn the box office that’s hoped for, Zach Snyder succeeded in doing the impossible – he made a film based on a prolific comic work and managed to keep the prolific in the details. And in doing so he’s causing the same kind of stir that its predecessor caused over twenty years ago.
Meanwhile, there’s a reclusive British writer who continues to believe that his works can’t be adapted. Even a peace can be disrupted by a journal.

The Don did it 35 minutes ago…