Office of the Don #66: Shows You Autumn Be Watching III: British Invasion!
Wednesday, April 7th, 2010Greetings, Pumpkinheads!!
Just when you thought I was finished talking about new television shows until fall (actually, I thought I was too), two more brilliant programs re-emerged on the RGB (RGBY if you’re George Takei) landscape this past week. And since I love both of them, I had to share them with you.
It’s like an Easter miracle!
“Ashes to Ashes”
Anyone familiar with the British hit series “Life on Mars” (as opposed to the less-than-stellar US version that came out in 2008) also knows about the spin-off series “Ashes to Ashes”. Where “Mars” was about a present day UK detective (Sam Tyler) who falls into a coma and wakes up in the 1970s, “Ashes” is about the police therapist assigned to Sam’s case who also falls into a coma when she is shot in the head by a criminal. She, however, wakes up in the 1980s. Both shows play up their combo sci-fi/period cop show elements well. But whereas “Mars” had a more dour and subdued tone, “Ashes” plays more bright and flashy. Of course both make total sense since they are each reflections of the decade they are set in. Though “Ashes” doesn’t quite have the gravitas that “Mars” had, I still find myself enjoying the hell out of this show. The premise fascinates me, and with the exception of the main protagonist – Alex Drake – a couple of the characters from the previous show carry over. And one in particular makes it all worthwhile:
DCI Gene Hunt.
Philip Glenister is just so much fun to watch playing this tough-as-nails blowhard who has no problems playing things off-book. His is a character that sets off a million whistles in a politically correct environment, but you can’t help but root for him.
“Ashes to Ashes” is in its third series (seasons are called series over there, like fries are called chips, chips are called crisps, and Americans are called confused), which will also be its last. I actually don’t mind that. I admire the Brits for being able to pull together serials that have a definite beginning, middle, and end. It makes for less filler episodes. Though I will be sad when this series reaches its final conclusion, I really hope it ends with a reappearance by Sam Tyler.
“Doctor Who”
I shouldn’t have to tell you about “Doctor Who”. The only way you could possibly be unaware of the existence of “Doctor Who” is if you were grown in a clone farm and released yesterday (sorry, Gary821).
I was first hooked onto this show back when I was a kid. It aired on our local PBS station. Unfortunately, PBS only aired the Tom Baker run (fourth Doctor), which was already out of date by the time I was watching in the early 80s. Still, I found the show to be ripe with low-budget charms, and the Doctor was nothing short of charismatic. In fact, as a prime example of the well-known side-effect of becoming a “Doctor Who” fan, my first Doctor became my favorite. I would eventually get to see episodes from all the different Doctors, but Baker was always my fave.
Until a couple of years ago. When “Doctor Who” came back to televisions in 2005 after a sixteen year absence (with a brief pit stop over here in the US in 1996 for a horribly-done movie that is considered canon), Christopher Eccleston ushered in a new era of Doctors. I liked his portrayal a lot, but after only doing one series there was just no way to see just how well he could have made the role his own.
Bring in his replacement – David Tennant – regenerating in as the tenth incarnation (I love the fact that David’s nickname of Tennie works on two levels). I had a hard time warming up to him at first, but once he managed to get comfy in his skin he was quite a brilliant Doctor, quickly replacing Baker as my favorite (and that wasn’t as easy a feat to accomplish as you might think). Combining wide-eyed wonder with a manic streak, a cheeky sense of humor and a smidge of darkness underneath, Tennant gave us a well-rounded and fun, yet dramatic take on the Time Lord.
Sadly, Tennant finally stepped down at the end of last year with the last of his 2009 specials. As I’ve reported before, his replacement was a relatively unknown bloke by the name of Matt Smith. The youngest actor to date to ever slip on the Time Lord’s footwear, Matt’s Doctor debuted this past weekend in the UK. Despite my love for Tennie, I was curious and intrigued by the new guy. I was definitely looking forward to what he would bring to the character.
I was not disappointed. At all. Bringing a little bit of Troughton’s Doctor into his personality, Smith plays the “odd Doctor” to the hilt, more so than either Tennant or Eccleston did. He’s quirky, he’s cheeky, and his complete demeanor just seems to run off-kilter to the world(s) around him.
And I like it. I don’t know that he’ll have the same impact on me that the tenth incarnation had, but never say never. I mean, I never expected any Doctor to dethrone my affection for Tom Baker’s. Am I excited to see what else he’s got up his sleeve? Oh, abso-flogging-lutely. He’s going to be a fun Doctor to have adventures with. And with Steven Moffat (arguably the best writer the new serials have had) now the head writer of the show, “Doctor Who” has the potential to be the best it’s ever been. I eagerly anticipate each episode. And though I’m looking forward to where the show goes from here, I still miss Tennant. It will take quite a bit to make me say “David who?”
On the other hand, the Doctor’s new companion does have me asking “Rose whatnow?” Red-headed, strong-willed, smartly-written, Scottish cuties for the win!
The Don is only on his third regeneration. He leads a boring life, and the last two regens were due to stupid accidents.




















